April 29, 2013

Global Warming was never about climate change !

CFACT

 "Climate change policy is about how we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth." - IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer



darkclouds


  • 1603
    Share

This article first appeared in Forbes online on February 5, 2013.

President Obama has put salvation from dreaded climate catastrophes on his action agenda hot list. During his second inaugural address he said: “We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations.” He went on to shame anyone who disagrees with this assessment, saying, “Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires and crippling drought and powerful storms.”

This sort of scary presidential prognostication isn’t new. He previously emphasized at the Democratic National Convention that global warming was “not a hoax,” referred to recent droughts and floods as “a threat to our children’s future,” and pledged to make the climate a second-term priority.

As much as I hate to nit-pick his doomsday scenarios, it might be appropriate to correct a few general misconceptions before getting back to that “overwhelming judgment of science” stuff.

Regarding wildfires, for example, their numbers since 1950 have decreased globally by 15%.

The Gentleperson's Guide To Forum Spies


4 March 2012. Precursor to this sabotage, OSS Sabotage of Organizations:

12 July 2012

The Gentleperson's Guide To Forum Spies

A sends:
The Gentleperson's Guide To Forum Spies (spooks, feds, etc.)

http://pastebin.com/irj4Fyd5

1. COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum
2. Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
3. Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist
4. How to Spot a Spy (Cointelpro Agent)
5. Seventeen Techniques for Truth Suppression
_________________________________________________________________


COINTELPRO Techniques for dilution, misdirection and control of a internet forum..

There are several techniques for the control and manipulation of a internet forum no matter what, or who is on it. We will go over each technique and demonstrate that only a minimal number of operatives can be used to eventually and effectively gain a control of a 'uncontrolled forum.'

Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING'

If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.

Technique #2 - 'CONSENSUS CRACKING'

April 27, 2013

The French, the UN and the Ivory Coast


By Dr. Gary K. Busch

Ouattara has been forced by the need to hold some form of plebiscite to demonstrate that his French-imposed Presidency of the country has some legitimacy in the Ivory Coast. He has just held municipal and local elections throughout the country which pitted his coalition (RDR and the PDCI) against nobody, as the FPI (the ex-Gbagbo party) opposition has boycotted this sham of an election. With a turnout of below 30% the unopposed candidates won. Ouattara and his French puppet-masters call this a victory. To the rest of the world this pathetic effort at political tumescence is the failure and disappointment that everyone expected and awaited.

The problem which plagues Ouattara and his cast of rebel rogues is that they do not have any legitimacy. The last election showed that they could not command a majority of the nation’s voters and reverted to electoral fraud and the vicious murder of thousands of Ivoirians by the French and UN helicopters which mowed down people without regard to their innocence and distance from any military activity in the name of the ‘international community’. They were aided by Dozo irregulars (tribal hunters) who were empowered, armed and protected as they killed their way across the West and centre of the Ivory Coast. The aftermath of this French-imposed rebel victory was the destruction of the lives and livelihoods of innocent Ivoirians who happened to be from non-Northern, non-Muslim ethnic groups. For almost a year and a half the residents of areas like Youpogon in Abidjan could not walk their own streets without being afraid of robbery, violence, arrest and murder by the new Ouattara forces who spoke only in Malinke or Dioula. Those who didn’t speak these languages were considered fair game and unprotectable by any forces of law and order.

Since 2002 the Ivory Coast has been divided by a rebellion which divided the country in two. This was a scheme devised by the French at the supposed ‘peace process’ at Linas-Marcoussis and has been enforced by the French Army ever since. It was not just a political separation; it was a religious and ethnic divide as well. The French Army separated the rebel North from the South and effectively divided the country along ethnic lines. The French, and later the United Nations, moved in to maintain this division and to protect the rebels from the wrath of the legitimate elected government of Gbagbo.


"Ces gens veulent nous imposer des systèmes dévastateurs pour la France et pour l’Europe..."

L'OBSERVATOIRE DE L'EUROPE 

Il y aura bientôt vingt ans, Philippe de Villiers et Jimmy Goldsmith menaient victorieusement la campagne de la liste "L'Autre Europe" aux élections européennes du 12 juin 1994, obtenant près de 13% des voix et autant d'eurodéputés. « Maastricht a été le pire des coups portés à l'Europe » annonçait le milliardaire libéral, anti-mondialiste et écologiste, deux ans à peine après l'approbation ric-rac du traité porté par François Mitterrand. On a retrouvé (merci Georges Berthu) ce discours que Jimmy prononça à la fin de la campagne, Porte de Versailles à Paris. Tout y est annoncé.

Discours de Jimmy Goldsmith lors du rassemblement pour la liste « L’Autre Europe » avec Philippe de Villiers - Porte de Versailles, 28 mai 1994
"Ces gens veulent nous imposer des systèmes dévastateurs pour la France et pour l’Europe..."
Nous avons voulu construire une Europe forte à l’extérieur, libre à l’intérieur, respectueuse des Nations, des traditions, de l’emploi, du monde rural et pour atteindre ce but, nous avons inclus dans le traité de ROME, un article qui prévoyait la préférence communautaire

Le traité de ROME, l’ origine de l’Europe, prévoyait un grand marché libre à l’intérieur, les personnes et les marchandises pouvaient circuler librement en Europe, mais vis-à-vis des pays Tiers, il y aurait un tarif unique, qui obligerait chaque nation à traiter le commerce avec les Pays-Tiers, de la même manière .


Germany's Virtuous Circle Takeover Of Europe

ZeroHedge

German finance minister Schaeuble just explained, in a seeming effort to assuage rising fears that the one core nation left in Europe will choose the game-theoretically optimal first-defection wins strategy, that "Germany benefits from the Euro more than others." Indeed it does; as German firms are buying up strong competitors, clients or suppliers at a time when those companies are struggling to stay afloat through years of recession in their home markets and as shaky banks restrict access to credit. It appears that the slow-and-steady bloodless invasion of Europe can be summed up by the following virtuous circle of Germany's hidden strategy. Of course, as Schaeuble explained later in his missive, "it is nonsense" that Germany wants a German Europe and that the Euro exchange rates is "Okay" for Germany.


Comment reconquérir durablement le pouvoir politique

Polémia

Les stratégies possibles des droites (ou des populistes ?) : comment reconquérir durablement le pouvoir politique ?

Les stratégies possibles des droites (ou des populistes ?) : comment reconquérir durablement le pouvoir politique ?


Colloque de l’Institut de géopolitique des populations – 13 avril 2013 – Immigration et élections : la droite pourra-t-elle encore gagner ?



Les stratégies possibles des droites (ou des populistes ?) : comment reconquérir durablement le pouvoir politique ?

Communication de Jean-Yves Le Gallou,

Président de Polémia


Obama et Hollande : deux élus des minorités ethniques

1- François Mitterrand a su bénéficier en son temps du vote immigré. Il a clientélisé le vote des communautés étrangères en promouvant le discours prétendument antiraciste, en se prononçant (sans le réaliser) pour le droit de vote des étrangers aux élections locales, en maillant le territoire d’un réseau d’associations subventionnées au titre de la politique de la ville.

April 26, 2013

The Adam Smith Lecture at Pembroke College: Smithian Inspirations and Their Difficult Fate in Central Europe

Klaus.cz


I take it as a great honour to be invited to deliver this year’s Adam Smith Lecture here at Pembroke College. It is an honour for me both for this lecture’s connection with the great, if not the greatest name in social sciences and economics in history (which Adam Smith undoubtedly is) and for the distinguished speakers who were chosen to deliver this lecture in the past two years.
One of them was my good friend Nigel Lawson with whom we – not entirely successfully – try to oppose for years already the irrational and dangerous global warming doctrine. We try to wake up the sleeping majority in the country and elsewhere which does not take it sufficiently seriously. We try to warn against the still misunderstood, underestimated and disparaged threats it brings to human freedom and economic prosperity all over the world.
I also learned a lot from reading the last year´s lecture given by Charles Moore. He devoted it to Margaret Thatcher and to the connection between – to my great regret more and more forgotten and misinterpreted if not caricatured – Margaret Thatcher and Adam Smith. Margaret Thatcher´s death two weeks ago is an irreplaceable loss for all of us. I hope it will motivate serious scholars and writers to the increase of interest in the studying of her unique legacy. (Yesterday, I organized a small conference about Margaret Thatcher in Prague and spoke there as well.)

Version of Asia Times: FBI could set up Tsarnaev brothers


An American portal, MWC News, published an article by an Asia Times correspondent Pepe Escobar, author of the book "Obama does Globalistan", in which he explained how the FBI could act in the case of the Tsarnaev brothers:

"The Boston bombing was major blowback. That much is certain. The question is, what level of blowback? 

It could have been a covert op gone real badly. It could have been blowback from former ''freedom fighters'' - in this case ethnic Chechens - reconverted into terra-rists. It could have been straight blowback for United States foreign policy targeting Muslims, whether dispatching them to Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib or Bagram, extraordinarily renditioning them, or target assassinating them.


The FBI, predictably, is not admitting any of these three options. It sticks to a convoluted screenplay worthy of those cocaine-fueled.


Hollywood nights in the 1980s; a couple of bad guys who ''hate our freedoms'' because... they do. 



April 24, 2013

EU politics: German defence minister gives game away

EUReferendum

Richard North24/04/2013   



Guardian 023-mai.jpg

An exclusive interview of German defence minister Thomas de Maizière, for the Guardianhighlights an apparent inconsistency, as the minister suggests that a UK outside the European Union would "jeopardise military standing".

Ostensibly, this is an absurd assertion, as the UK would continue to participate in joint military ventures through its membership of NATO, the activities of which are increasingly duplicating EU military initiatives.

Unwittingly, though, de Maizière is revealing a mindset now prevalent amongst European defence ministers, who are sharing the view offered by this article, effectively conceding that the days of NATO are numbered.

April 23, 2013

The Terrorist Puzzle

FINANCIAL SENSE

BY JR NYQUIST
04/22/2013

Terrorists have killed American citizens once again. The chief suspects are listed as Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, brothers aged 26 and 19 respectively. They are Muslims from Russia who, according to authorities, detonated two bombs near the finish line of the Boston Marathon on Monday, 15 April. President Barack Obama said that whoever did the bombing will “feel the full weight of justice.” Since that statement Boston police have killed Tamerlan and captured Dzhokhar.
An air of controversy is building about the suspects, even now. An “Op-Edge” analysis piece published by Russia Today claims “that very little clarity surrounds the case.” There are questions as to how the surviving suspect, 19-year-old Dzhokhar, “could walk out of the boat he was hiding in … with a throat wound that he is now almost dying from.” Russia’s official media says the suspects originated from Kyrgyzstan, in the town of Tormok, which is ethnically Chechen. Back in Russia, the father of the accused brothers says that his sons are being framed.
According to Judicial Watch’s Corruption Chronicles of April 22, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was arrested and possibly convicted for domestic violence in 2009. According to a Judicial Watch source, the Obama administration could have deported Tamerlan “but evidently didn’t feel he represented a big enough threat.” Years ago, we read, “Judicial Watch uncovered criticalintelligence documents detailing Al Qaeda’s activities in Chechnya, including the creation of a 1995 camp – ordered by Osama bin Laden – to train ‘international terrorists’ to carry out plots against Americans and westerners.”

Dagestani jihadist group issues statement on Boston bombings


Vilayat Dagestan, a jihadist group that is part of the Caucasus Emirate, an al Qaeda-linked group operating in the North Caucasus, has issued a statement on the Boston Marathon bombings.
The group released the statement on its main website earlier today, citing "speculation" in the press that one of the bombers "could be affiliated with the mujahideen of the Caucasus Emirate, in particular, the mujahideen of Dagestan." The statement has been translated by the SITE Intelligence Group.
The organization's statement references Tamerlan Tsarnaev, one of two brothers responsible for the bombings, who reportedly traveled to Dagestan and Chechnya last year.
Vilayat Dagestan does not deny any connection to Tsarnaev, nor does it say that he was known to them prior to the bombings. Instead, the group says that it is "at war with Russia" and "not fighting against the United States of America."
Moreover, Vilayat Dagestan says that if the US government is "really interested in discovering the true organizers of the explosions in Boston, without being complicit in a Russian show, they should focus on the involvement of the Russian special services in the event."
US intelligence officials contacted by The Long War Journal say that a number of jihadist groups based in the Caucasus and Chechnya are being investigated. However, the investigation is still in its earliest stages and it is not yet known whether any of them played a role, directly or indirectly, in the Boston bombings.
It is far too early to draw any firm conclusions one way or the other, these officials say.
According to NBC 4 New York, Tamerlan Tsarnaev left New York for Russia on Jan. 12, 2012 and returned on July 17.
Subsequent reports indicate that Tsarnaev traveled to Dagestan and Chechnya during those months and it is this trip that has drawn suspicion.

April 20, 2013

''Chechen insurgents deny any link to marathon bombing''


NBC NEWS: ''Chechen insurgents deny any link to marathon bombing''



The third-largest US mainstream television channel NBC Newsreported in the article "Chechen insurgents deny any link to marathon bombing. The article states:

"The militant group responsible for the Chechen insurgency cast doubt Friday on allegations that the two known suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing - who are of Chechen origin - carried out the attacks.

The official media arm of the Chechen mujahedeen, the Kavkaz Center, published a blog post that suggested the investigation into Monday's deadly attack is part of an anti-Chechnya "PR campaign."  

The Kavkaz Center mocked the "lightning speed" at which the two known suspects in the attack on the Boston Marathon - Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, who was at large on Friday,  and his brother, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, who was killed in a firefight with law enforcement - were identified. The group called the investigation "completely muddled".

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in December 1991, Chechen fighters have waged a violent struggle against the Kremlin, leading to two bloody wars and the loss of hundreds of thousands of civilian lives.

In a translation of the blog provided by Evan Kohlmann, an NBC News security analyst, the Chechens questioned the logic that the Tsarnaev brothers could be terrorists.

"The news that the brothers attacked police officers, carjacked a man and did an array of other things, instead of going into hiding, looks strange at the very least", the article said.

NBC's Richard Engel discusses the recent history of unrest in the Caucasus where the suspects in the Mass. terror attacks are believed to have been raised for the early part of their lives.

Boston Bombing Suspects: Grassroots Militants from Chechnya

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_8v_cvxgMx3o/TGPju9Etk9I/AAAAAAAACAM/AalzVZ_e-0Q/s320/Stratfor.JPG

Jared Wickerham/Getty Images
Timothy Alben (C) of the Massachusetts State Police and
Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davis (Center R) in Watertown, Mass., on April 19
The identities of the suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing -- Chechen brothers Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19, and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26 -- appear
tentatively to confirm several of Stratfor's suspicions. From this profile, the simple nature of the attack, their efforts to rob a convenience store and their lack of an escape plan, we can at least say at this point in time that they were what we refer to as grassroots militants. Despite being amateurs, such militants clearly still pose a significant threat.

Analysis

Just after 10 p.m. on April 18, the Tsarnaev brothers were identified after having robbed a convenience store in Cambridge, Mass., just three miles from Boston, hours earlier. A Massachusetts Institute of Technology police officer, who responded to the robbery, was shot and killed and found in his car by fellow responding officers. The two suspects later hijacked an SUV at gunpoint, releasing the driver unharmed. Authorities later caught up to the suspects, and a car chase ensued.

April 17, 2013

Margaret Thatcher took on the unions. The next Thatcher will need to take on the establishment itself


"Today we bury a great leader", I told my four-year-old this morning (is it too early to indoctrinate my children? She’ll soon be at an age where, if my schooling was anything to go, she’ll learn all about the peaceful Native Americans, and I’ll have to show her a chart explaining that hunter-gatherer societies all have absurdly high homicide rates, but that’s for another time). It’s worth telling the children, because very soon they’ll all be instructed into the narrative that Margaret Thatcher was a very bad woman.
What’s striking about all this is that the hatred does not come from the northern towns ruined in the late 20th century, but the London public sector classes, who did well under Mrs T.
Great leaders ensure that they control the propaganda. The reason history remembers Alfred the Great and has entirely forgotten his grandson Athelstan, who actually unified England, is that Alfred employed a chronicler called Asser. Therefore Alfred wrote his own history. Today there are plenty of kids called Alfie, but there aren’t any Athies. Mrs Thatcher’s enemies wrote the history of her times, in television, theatre and fiction.
In a wider sense her profound failure was to lose the culture war, or not even fight it. As Tim Montgomerie reminded us on Monday, conservatism cannot triumph in economics while it remains totally beaten in the cultural sphere.
While she destroyed an opposition base when the manufacturing industry shed its jobs – with terrible human cost – she actually helped to build up a far bigger and more powerful enemy class, led by local government and the administrators of the welfare state that flowered during her reign. She destroyed lots of unproductive working-class jobs and created lots of unproductive middle-class ones. She was responsible for New Labour and Tony Blair in more than one way, and this makes it harder for Conservatives to ever win again.
From the outer spheres of Whitehall to the BBC, from quangoland to the charities (the ‘third sector’ as they now call themselves with that echo of ‘fifth column’), Left-wing intellectuals are on the march.
That’s so true. Among my contemporaries, huge numbers of talented people work in areas where there is an institutional hostility to conservatism, for the simple reason that conservatives do not believe their work should be professionalised and run by the state. Younger conservative politico types tend to move in these circles and know these people from school and university, so any Tory leader who takes them on will have to accept huge personal unpopularity and social death.
But it cannot be challenged while Conservatives think like George Osborne. When I criticised Thatcherism the other day what I specifically meant was Thatcherism as it has now become: libertarian and self-centred.
Libertarians think they can get a Victorian-sized state without Victorian attitudes, but they’re deluded. If you really want a small state that doesn’t tell you what to do and gobble up half your income then start going to church, get involved in voluntary activities, tell the vicar or priest to stop droning on about the cuts and climate change and tell him to start shouting about sin and fornication. Repress yourself, you’ll find it’s good for your wallet.
Were that to happen, then the need for an enormous state apparatus managing vast areas of our life would be reduced. As it is the blob gets bigger and bigger every year and will help to bring down Cameron, not the least because the powerful state broadcaster is very much part of it.
But then Cameron and Osborne, like Thatcher’s predecessors with the consensus establishment of their day, wish to be liked by these people. They want to be part of a cultural consensus, but as with any consensus the inevitable tendency is for it to drift towards the line of least resistance, the political stance that is least socially controversial: the centre-Left. If Conservatives wish to win the economic arguments – and so defeat the blob – they will have to win the social arguments too. That will require someone who doesn’t mind being hated: in short, a statesman. Or woman.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100212493/margaret-thatcher-took-on-the-unions-the-next-thatcher-will-need-to-take-on-the-establishment-itself/

Boston Terror NWO Shock and Awe ?

The Conservative Monster – Conservative News

Analysis on Global Events


Steve Cooper
The Conservative Monster


The Boston terror attack was part of the psych warfare campaign that I keep warning about. It was more shock an awe. Attack the US, but then not allow the words Islam or terrorism to even be mentioned. Liberals are attacking anyone that dares to bring up Islamic terrorism.

Shock and awe creates trauma. This fits into the category of psych warfare.
THE TERRORISTS HAVE WON! The American Left has protected and enabled them for the past 60 years as part of the War against Capitalism. Also, the war to control the worlds oil. The war against Capitalism is being executed by the Elitists seeking world Communism and they are using Muslim terrorists as their foot soldiers.

Now you understand why eleven years after 9/11 and the US has not made any gains in the war on terror. ZERO! The US Military leadership has been de-balled by bowing down to liberal rules of engagement. The Democrats voted for the Iraq war and then the fought as hard as they could to defend the enemy from within the halls of Washington DC.

George Bush wanted to take down Iran next due to their connections to 9/11, Al Qaeda and killing US Troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.


Marxist Merkel leads Germany’s new Push to Destroy Capitalism in Europe


by John Galt
April 14, 2013 23:30 EDT

Everyone seems to think that Angela Merkel, the current Führer of Germany, is an angelic saint who wishes to retain and improve the European Union and capitalism within the borders of her nation and beyond. Yet nobody wishes to publish, disclose, or review her communist past and work within the Soviet Union’s empire. I first looked at this in September of 2011 where I stated:

The Future of the Capitalist World is Controlled by 2 Students of Marx


Nobody cared.

Think any of the talking heads had their staff investigate her writings, collegiate records, her father or political appointment within the Soviet bloc? Uh, that answer would be a resounding “no.” In fact very little effort has been made to explore President Obama’s pre-Congressional career travels, especially during the 1980′s to find out if his education included a bit more than the dab of ‘red’ he received under Bill Ayers and others of that ilk.

Fast forward to the crisis in the Eurozone today and the headlines from Die Welt in Germany and theUK Telegraph, respectively, warn of the ultimate goal:

Savers Liability for Banks to be the Norm

(translated via Google)

German ‘Wise Men’ push for wealth seizure to fund EMU bail-outs


April 15, 2013

EU—Maastricht’s Golden Fangs

April 15, 2013 • From theTrumpet.com

Two decades following its enactment, the Maastrich Treaty reveals its true impact.

Over two decades ago, after reading the fine print of the Maastricht Treaty—the EU treaty that established the euro—we deduced correctly that any nation signing up to the European Monetary Union, for which Maastricht was the enabling treaty, would be virtually signing over possession of their national bullion stocks to the EU central bank.

Now that has become the reality for the benighted nation of Cyprus. The demand by the European Central Bank for proceeds from gold sales to be channeled to its own centralized coffers is the first manifestation of the golden fangs of Maastricht in action. It may not be the last.

In our September/October 2002 edition, we noted that “when 11 of the present 15 EU member nations joined the European Monetary Union (emu), they signed over their individual national holdings of gold to the European Central Bank, located in Frankfurt, Germany!”

This week, Cyprus came under an ECB directive, its wording confirming the Maastricht edict , requiring it to channel proceeds of any bullion sales to its coffers in Frankfurt.

April 14, 2013

Hayek’s Conference at the University of Richmond: Hayek and My Life


Klaus.cz

Many thanks for giving me a chance to address this distinguished audience. This is my first visit to the University of Richmond and, if I am not mistaken, my first stay in the state of Virginia as well.
Some of you may know that I am enjoying the first days and weeks of my post-political life. A month ago, I completed my second term as the President of the Czech Republic and it means – with a very high degree of probability – an end to my political career, which started in the moment of the fall of communism in November 1989. I am slowly discovering a new life – for the first time in two decades, I am moving about in this country without being accompanied by the U. S. secret service.
I take it as a great honor to be asked to speak here today about a man I admire and have admired for decades. Today’s conference is not my first opportunity to speak about this great man. I spoke about him more comprehensibly in May 2009 in Germany[1] when I was awarded the Hayek Prize by the Hayek Foundation. It was in the city of Freiburg where he spent last three decades of his long and extremely fruitful life. Last time I spoke about him was in September 2012 at a Hayek Colloquium in Obergurgl, Tyrol, which is another of his places. As a devoted mountaineer he spent most of his European holidays there and, as is well-known, he wrote his Constitution of Liberty[2] there.

April 11, 2013

Heads of the Services: It’s a Conspiracy or a Russian Operation

Home


Heads of the Services: It’s a Conspiracy or a Russian Operation(photo )
After the Smolensk catastrophe, there should be analyses from the special services evaluating two hypotheses. The first is a conspiracy on the part of officials and firms with the goal of intercepting a contract for the renovation of the Tu-154. The second: an action by the Russian special services resulting in the acquisition of access to the airplane during the renovation.

According to the authors of the assessment, Jerzy Kicinski, acting head of the ABW in 2007, as well as Andrzej Kowalski, former acting head of the Military Counterintelligence Services, included in the report of Antoni Macierewicz’s team, the Federal Service of Military-Technical Collaboration (FSWTW), which played the main role in directing the bidding process for the renovation of the Tupolev, is posing as a cover for Russian intelligence. In relation to this, the representatives of the TSWTW who have established contact with Polish institutions that are essential to Polish affairs should be subject to reconnaissance by the Military Counterintelligence Services (SKW) and the actions of the FSWTW around the world should be under constant SWW observation. Operational actions that would allow for the identification of people employed in the FSWTW and those suspected of working on behalf of the SWR/GRU intelligence should be carried out.   


7 most annoying Thatcher myths

Sand sculpture on the beach of Margaret Thatcher, wishing Adieu to the Iron Lady
Sinking the Belgrano was a crime? Not even the Argentinians believe that
Whether you are a true blue fan of the Iron Lady or will be opening the bubbly at the celebratory party at Trafalgar Square on Saturday, it is worth getting your facts straight. So here are 7 thought-provoking myths which both sides ought to appreciate being punctured.

1) She killed manufacturing

British factories increased output by 7.5% during her premiership. Output grew a further 4.9% by 1997. Curiously, it was under Labour that the decline hit. By the end of Brown’s tenure at Number 10, manufacturing output was lower than the day Thatcher left office. The manufacturing share of GDP fell almost continuously – as it did in pretty much every Western nation.

2) “Everybody hates Thatcher”

A Guardian ICM poll gives the Iron Lady a 16-point net-approval rating, with half of Brits saying she was “good for Britain”. And it’s not a de mortuis bounce. In September a YouGov poll revealed only two politicians in the nation were in net positive approval territory: Boris Johnson and Margaret Thatcher. David Cameron polled at minus 18, Ed Miliband at minus 29, and George Osborne at minus 53.  

3) Scargill wished to negotiate

Thatcher went to war with the mining unions. But her adversary’s role is often overlooked. Arthur Scargill was the boss of the National Union of Mineworkers, and what sort of a man was he?

April 10, 2013

Faux Conservatives, the Script, and the Death of the Conservative Movement



The conservative movement is dying, if it isn’t already dead. But neither “the Left” nor some rightist doctrine is the culprit. Rather, the movement is reaching the point of extinction because those of whom it is comprised, and its mainstream-media spokespersons particularly, have all but killed it.

And they’ve killed it by abandoning conservatism in favor of the ideology of their opponents.   

The self-described conservative who listens routinely to talk radio and watches Fox News will no doubt have trouble making heads or tails of my diagnosis. Yet it is high time that he grasp that he has been had.

Today’s “conservative” spokespersons are faux conservatives. What amounts to the same thing, they are leftists of varying degrees.

The political clashes that we witness today are actually internecine conflicts between leftist factions. In other words, the not so grand stage of Broadway on the Potomac serves as the venue in which leftist Democrats and leftist Republicans enact their co-authored script — a script from which the bane-stream media in both of its conventional leftist and faux conservative guises then faithfully reads.


April 8, 2013

Margaret Thatcher : "The Bruges Speech" (1988)

1988 Sep 20 Tu

Speech to the College of Europe ("The Bruges Speech")


Prime Minister

Prime Minister, Rector, Your Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen: First, may I thank you for giving me the opportunity to return to Bruges and in very different circumstances from my last visit shortly after the Zeebrugge Ferry disaster, when Belgian courage and the devotion of your doctors and nurses saved so many British lives. And second, may I say what a pleasure it is to speak at the College of Europe under the distinguished leadership of its [Professor Lukaszewski ] Rector. The College plays a vital and increasingly important part in the life of the European Community. And third, may I also thank you for inviting me to deliver my address in this magnificent hall. What better place to speak of Europe's future than a building which so gloriously recalls the greatness that Europe had already achieved over 600 years ago.

Your city of Bruges has many other historical associations for us in Britain. Geoffrey Chaucer was a frequent visitor here. And the first book to be printed in the English language was produced here in Bruges by William Caxton .

 

Britain and Europe

Real Conspiracies: Past and Present - Part 1


9-4-2006
Real Conspiracies: Past and Present Part 1
by Berit Kjos
*   *   *
Emphasis added in bold letters

President Woodrow Wilson, 1913: "Some of the biggest men in the U. S., in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."[1]
President Franklin Roosevelt, 1933: "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."[2]
"Why do the nations rage, and the people plot [conspire] a vain thing?" Psalm 2:1
"What do you conspire against the Lord?"  Nahum 1:9



Real conspiracies -- in contrast to mere "conspiracy theories" -- have spawned fear, murder, lies, and revolution throughout history. Driven by greed, envy, or utopian visions, they reflected the darkness of human nature. No nation or empire has been immune to such intrigue. Betrayal, murder, and convenient wars stain the records of ancient Israel and Judah as well as the history of mighty empires like Assyria, Babylon, Persia, China, Greece, and Rome.[3] The nations of Renaissance Europe -- always competing for dominion and commercial markets -- were torn by the same human impulses.

More recent conspirators such as Lenin, Stalin, and Mao bound their masses to inflexible Communist standards that banned the Bible, condemned resisters, and rewarded public torture and murder. Such cruelty would intimidate the masses into compliance. Hidden behind their atrocities were Western supporters -- including the financial establishments of J. P. Morgan, Carnegie and the Rockefellers -- which funded revolutionaries and fueled the global vision of totalitarian control.[4]
Few have done more to expose this global agenda than Carroll Quigley, an influential former history professor at the Foreign Service Schools of Georgetown University. You may remember him as Bill Clinton's mentor, honored by his presidential pupil at the 1992 Democratic Convention. Ponder this revelation from his 1300-page report, Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time:

April 7, 2013

China supplied North Korea with an orbital nuke platform

Britannia Radio


This just arrive today via another newsgroup i'm member of (sources & links provided within the article/report) I hope to God this is but an April fools, or a peaceful solution will be found to settle disputes, otherwise ( & as per usually is the case) countless innocent people could suffer terribly. Why the heck are madmen in charge of the planet. God help us.

Kindest from pennine-article follows>>>
.......................................................
China supplied North Korea with an orbital nuke platform

China supplied North Korea with an orbital nuke platform
That's
what NK launched into space in February. It wasn't just a test 
satellite. It's small but potent and contains 5 tactical 
orbit-to-surface nukes, each with a 500 kiloton payload. 

This is
why NK has adopted a totally warlike rhetoric. They may be outgunned 
and outnumbered but they have unlimited firing range. Detonated above 
the US/Europe/Asia/ Japan they'll be able to knock out the electrical 
grid and begin their own ground invasion of South Korea and Japan, 
leaving Europe and the US to China.

Trust me, this is the 
absolute truth. My uncle is a general in the British army and they are 
trying their best to keep a lid on this to prevent worldwide panic. 
Apparently Obama is "looking at all the options" whatever that means.
http://www.godlikep roductions. com/forum1/ message2191950/ pg1

Re: China supplied North Korea with an orbital nuke platform
You
can check out [this article]( [link to www.northkoreatech. org] that 
mentions "4 objects being tracked by NORAD". However, 3 of those were 
probably rocket boosters and/or debris. 

April 5, 2013

Intelligence insider: Obama administration agenda to “kill U.S Dollar”



This week, I had a series of very sobering discussions with my highly-placed source within the intelligence world. The information he provided hit me like a proverbial tons of bricks. It connects everything we are seeing play out across the world, from the economic problems in Europe to the U.S. DHS ammunition acquisition orders and even the “gun control” debate. If you’re like me, you’re looking for clarity, context and focus with regard to all of the events we’re constantly hearing about but seem to lack legitimate explanation. I believe this report will provide the context and clarity we are all seeking, but I must warn you that the picture is not pretty.


The economic agenda: In plain sight


Some might be surprised to learn that the fate of America’s economy has already been determined, verified and announced by the Obama White House. Yet, it has received scant attention from the corporate media. In 2011, economist Kyle Bass interviewed a senior member of the Obama administration about its planned solutions for fixing the US economy and trade deficit[ia].

Among the questions he asked was about U.S. exports and wages, but the question itself was not nearly as important as the response he received from this senior administration official. In fact, this single, seven word response clarifies everything, explains everything, and leaves little else to discuss: “We’re just going to kill the dollar.”

Bankster racket – The Cyprus template that wasn’t a template is now a template

 Autonomous Mind

Remember how Cyprus was supposed to be a special case and not a template for similar wealth confiscation elsewhere in the future?  Remember how it transpired the measures taken in Cyprus had already been written into the Banking Act 2009?  Well the Banksters are getting bolder as a piece on ZeroHedge makes clear:
The CEO of Unicredit Federico Ghizzoni said yesterday that it is “acceptable to confiscate savings to save banks.” He said that the savings which are not guaranteed by any protection or insurance could be used in the future to contribute to the rescue of banks who fail and that uninsured deposits could be used in future bank failures provided global policy makers agree on a common approach.
The organised racket is very clear.  Any money we put into bank accounts is a loan to the bank.  Given that governments don’t have the money to bail out banks, which have been run into the ground while using our money to carry out poorly considered lending to borrowers who are defaulting or declaring bankruptcy, they are now treating the money lent to them by depositors as exactly what the rules say it is – theirs.  Caveat creditor.

Note the reference to having a common approach to global policy.  Global governance is the agenda at play.  The wealthy elite makes the rules and is now applying the rules to protect their financial position at the expense of anyone who is willing to risk putting their money in one of their institutions.  If the Banksters don’t get your money, then be assured the global cooperation and harmonisation gradually being developed by governments will see to it that taxation will hoover up your wealth.  No permission sought, no approval given, just the abuse of power by the political class and their establishment cronies.
It has been clear in the way governments are exchanging supposedly confidential account information between each other, under the pretext of tackling tax evasion.  But even where there is no evasion, this exchange provides vital intelligence about the holdings of individuals that can be used to inform governments about who has what, so policy can be created to target them for specific taxes and wealth confiscation – all to satisfy the bribery and spending fetishes that politicians rely on to buy votes of the net consumers at the expense of the net producers.

While politicians like to spout off about democracy and freedom, their actions are designed for a single purpose, to enslave the people who are supposed to be their masters.  Government, both supranational and national, never shrinks.  The parasite continues to expand by feeding on the people they are supposed to serve.

The only thing it doesn’t seem to have planned for is what happens when the incentives to production have been destroyed and the wealth it plunders has run out.  What will the state’s clients do when their free handouts come to an end?  Perhaps by they the planet will be so collectivised we will be scratching the land to produce food and resorting to barter as the medium of exchange.  Progress will have been reversed and the green wet-dream of ‘sustainability’ will be realised.

At what point will the sleepwalking masses wake up and put an end to it?  There is no conspiracy theory here, just conspiracy.

http://autonomousmind.wordpress.com/2013/04/05/bankster-racket-the-cyprus-template-that-wasnt-a-template-is-now-a-template/